Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 03:35

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What are 50 random facts about yourself?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Circle IPO soars, giving hope to more startups waiting to go public - TechCrunch
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
First-ever airborne toxin detected in Western Hemisphere - Phys.org
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
GTA Online Money Fronts Update Download Goes Live Early - RockstarINTEL
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What Happens to Your Body When You Eat Watermelon Regularly - Verywell Health
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.